On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:36 AM Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What the heck are you talking about? As far as I can see this patch is > about adding hw specific alignment to vlVaCreateImage which is a state > tracker function. > > Completely agree that vlVaGetImage should respect the parameters given > instead of using the one from the surface, but that sounds like a > different problem. > > Maybe mixing mail threads?
The stated reason (when I originally asked why this was being done) was that vlVaGetImage would overwrite bits past the image created with vlVaCreateImage (because it uses the full surface size, rather than the x/y/width/height clipped to both the image and the surface). My comment was that the fix needs to go into vlVaGetImage, not into vlVaCreateImage. Cheers, -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
