>
>Recently, Scott Raney wrote:
>
>> This really gets back to the issue of "are stacks documents or
>> applications?" debate that has come up several times in various places
>> over the years.  My UNIX and CS background causes me to consider them
>> applications, whereas people with a less technical background tend to
>> consider them documents.
>
>Are pages of text considered "applications" on UNIX?  I would imagine these
>are incapable of launching or being edited without some type of engine.
>Isn't a MC stack the same type of animal?  You can't launch or edit a stack
>without some type of engine, regardless of whether the engine is external or
>bound to the stack.  Granted, I am "less technical" but since (as far as I
>know) you can't "technically" do anything with a stack unless you have the
>engine, a stack would be considered a document.

The analogy is not right. When you doubleclick a stack you launch the engine. The 
functionality of a text file without an environment which would allow for 
editing is close to none; a stack without the development environment can be as useful 
as any application.
I frequently run stacks that way and would be both bothering and a waist of energy to 
have the Home and Tools
present when I don't need them. I'm not technical either but the difference between 
the engine and the IDE is obvious.

>
>> Not sure where to draw the line on this
>> one: Abide by user expectations, or force them to adapt to a more
>> technically sophisticated architecture?
>
>I might suggest catering to clueless folks like myself, in the interest of
>remaining approachable.  The people who have more technical understanding
>will "get it" on their own.
>
>Regards,
>
>Scott
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>Scott Rossi                       Tactile Media - Multimedia & Design
>Creative Director                 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                                  Web: www.tactilemedia.com
>
>
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
>Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
>Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
>
>.


Regards, Andu 
_______________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.

Reply via email to