>Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote: >> >> Richard's not a web designer; he's a graphic designer. He put his portfolio >> on blogspot after I commented that downloading a single, enormous PDF kindof >> sucked, and I didn't know of a CMS that didn't suck. >> > >It should go without saying (after everything that's already been said), but >for www.openbsd.org, technical prowess (clean and concise implementation) is >more important than graphic design skills.
Agreed. >If they can't do both, then a new template isn't even worth attempting. Disagreed. Compare the dispatching of tasks in OpenBSD itself; there are different experts for different areas. Vertical vs horizontal. Anyway I'm done with this thread; Ted put it quite clearly. I don't have a major problem with the web site other than I almost dismissed OpenBSD because the site and docs feel 10 years old. Free- and NetBSD looked much nicer but after I saw actual usage stats I gave OpenBSD a 2nd look and forced myself past the floppy/tape references and found OpenBSD's philosophy which just made sense. In other circumstances I might have missed OpenBSD entirely, so I instinctively don't like those red herrings, but I really don't know if more public attention would make OpenBSD a better system. Linux's example seems to show it just goes from bad to worse. -- p
