> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:43:14PM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote: > > Le 2012-10-24 14:25, Kurt Mosiejczuk a écrit : > > >The one use I could think of us to make your internal network > > >independent of your ISP. Right now, if you change ISPs, your network > > >prefix changes and your whole network has to be renumbered. > > > > > >I read about it in the following article earlier this year. > > >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/31/ipv6_sucks_for_smes/ > > > > > >I'd be happy to have it pointed out to me how the article is wrong, but > > >it seemed to point out the ugly corners the IPv6 folks don't talk about. > > > > What you need to multihome is either BGP or NAT. Exactly as in IPv4. > > Nothing has changed. The only new thing with IPv6 is that there's > > more bits. > > But less PI space. Since some evangelists belive in the superiority of > IPv6 and try everything to make it impossible to get routable PI space. > At the moment IPv6 is a step backwards in all regards. > If the idea would be to get everybody to use v6 then the RIR should give > out IPv6 ranges like candy -- if you have a PI IPv4 space you should get a > PI IPv6 space. But instead people still dream of the 10k routing table... > > I know one thing for sure. In the next few years the internet will suck.
I could not say it better myself. I agree completely.
