Hi John, Thank you for this info! Yes, I have just built the mlvm yesterday before your mail to Christian.
Chanwit On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:42 AM, John Rose<[email protected]> wrote: > That reminds me of a bug we fixed in the mlvm patches during JavaOne; > it was a heap stomping problem. I don't think there was a workaround. > > I think you have two options with this problem: > - wait for the mlvm changes to percolate into JDK7 and the JDK7 > standard builds > - obtain or build a version of the JVM from the mlvm patches (or have > you done this?) > > -- John > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi wrote: > >> I see, Remi ! >> Thank you for the explanation. >> >> Chanwit >> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Rémi Forax<[email protected]> wrote: >>> It's more a GC crash, with more memory you don't trigger the GC, that >>> why it's working fine. > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > -- Chanwit Kaewkasi PhD Candidate, Centre for Novel Computing School of Computer Science The University of Manchester Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL, UK _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
