Chanwit Kaewkasi schrieb: > Hi Jochen, > > If it's still saying that it could not find some SNMP classes, > probably you need to clean build after applying patches.
it looks like I am really too stupid for this to build. I manage to build the openjdk, but the mlvm.... I spend another full day just on trying getting this run :( I was too fast the last time, I think I did build the jvm without the patches. Anyway, the documentation I found and that John linked works so far, but once the setup is supposedly done, it ends. The documentation is not for making a build, it is for people writing patches. For example a very simple question... do I need to "make" in ./sources first or in ./patches. What I did before was running make in patches, overseeing the error, because it is writing that the build was successful at the same time, then build in sources and I assume the changes were not done or overwritten. So I assume the right order is to first run the build in sources and then in patches... ah well, while trying that I found a few problems, because I have to set ALT_HOTSPOT_SERVER_PATH and ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH. But there is no documentation on those and I gave it really several tries to guess the right once. In the end I maybe managed, but I am not sure. What are those supposed to be pointing too? Or is having have to set them a sign that I do something wrong? Anyway... it is really annoying to have to check several pages of make output for an error line... isn't there a way to prevent make doing several jobs at the same time and to let it stop at the error then? I always thought one make job at the same time is default anyway... At last the sanity check done by patches shouldn't report "Sanity check passed." if something has a /NOT-SET/re/, because all of these variables seem to have to be set. So I found two more: ALT_BUILD_JDK_IMPORT_PATH and ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH. Again no docu I could find... maybe ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH is enough... well setting it let go of the error message at the end.. I suppose I did set some surplus variables too then. And after all that trouble... it still does not work, I get still the same internal error. Btw, how do I tell that I want a debug version? without debug symbols the reporting on internal errors isn't very great. bye blackdrag -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org) http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
