On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:
> [...]
> <lots of good info snipped>
>
> Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
>
> It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
> be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm
> cache.
>
> Has anyone had BAD experiences with it?
>
> What do you think, Ralf?
Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out
of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the
configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will
not blow away our legs.... ;)
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Geoff Thorpe
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Geoff Thorpe
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? David Rees
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Brett W. McCoy
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Ralf S. Engelschall
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? John . Airey
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Mads Toftum
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Geoff Thorpe
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Ralf S. Engelschall
