On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > <lots of good info snipped>
> >
> > Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
> >
> > It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
> > be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm
> > cache.
> >
> > Has anyone had BAD experiences with it?
> >
> > What do you think, Ralf?
>
> Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out
> of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the
> configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will
> not blow away our legs.... ;)
Cool.
Maybe an explanation of the different shm session cache options
would be nice as part of the ApacheCon presentation? (it wasn't too
difficult to guess the location of those slides ;-) Or maybe just a
couple of words in the reference manual about it ;-)
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
