* Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-17 12:45]: > There is, however, another advantage to the catagory approach: > Searching would likely be more consistent. It would help > authors to place their modules so that they can be found with > similar modules. It would also help ensure that users looking > for a particular type module will get back a result set that is > likely to contain all/most of the modules of that type.
Why does it have to be either/or? There could be two keyword lists, one with fixed keywords, and the other freeform. Their names would have to be chosen carefully to suggest this as the intended use (rather than filling both with the same keywords) -- maybe ``keywords'' and ``additional_keywords'' or something. Regards, -- Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
