On Sat, 04 Mar 2006, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Dr Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-04 09:00]: > >On Fri, 03 Mar 2006, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > >> I had been thinking of XML::SlickTemplate. :-) Or else I might > >> go with XML::SimpleTemplate.
> They’re better than Xmplate in that they actually contain the > word “Template,” but they’re not very descriptive, no. I’m not > satisfied, but I’m still failing to come up with a truly > satisfactory name. :-/ What about Template::XML? Except that it might be thought to be part of Template Toolkit. -- Dr Bean
