* Lincoln A. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-26 05:00]: >> Also, if anything, it would have to be XML::StrictTemplate, >> since XML::Template::Strict sounds like it has some sort of >> commonality with XML::Template, of which there is absolutely >> none. > >Now that I like better. it conveys a real distinction, and tells >me something.
The problem is that the distinction is really hard to put in a single word. How do you express “templatish, Perlish and XMLish?” >> Maybe I should give up and just try to generically >> differentiate from XML::Template, like maybe XML::ExTemplate? > >If you are going in that direction... why not just >XML::XTemplate or XML::xTemplate or XML::nTemplate (n=new) I was thinking ::SlickTemplate. >Now that I think about it... why not post a pod so we can see >what the interface might look like. I don’t have anything like that yet. I’m still in the sketching phase, the code is only half-written, etc. As I said, I might end up never uploading this at all. >Are you depending on one of the XML parser modules? Yes, XML::LibXML, but I don’t think that’s a useful distinction for naming the module, if that was your tack. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
