On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:18:11PM +0200, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: > If the main objects your module will manipulate still are URIs, maybe > it should be in the URI:: namespace. And couldn't the bidirectional > relation you want to create be seen like a mapping? Hence URI::Mapper > or something similar?
Not necessarily. I was trying to keep it generic. URL/URIs, file paths,
ID strings,... any thing that has a simple string format which includes
variables somehow embedded in it. LDAP DNs maybe?
dn: cn=${NAME:\w+}, o=${UNIT:\w+}, dc=example, dc=com
I wanted to leave it generic at a string level.
--
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
