On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:46 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:39:21PM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > > > In general, listing everything is a good idea -- but there are cases where > it > > is just too much work right now. For dists that contain dozens of > modules, all > > of which are very unlikely to ever be split up, it's not very interesting > or > > useful for an author to list everything he uses. Tk and Catalyst are good > > examples. > > Catalyst is an excellent example. I'm sure it has gone through at least > one fairly major re-organisation of its distributions at some point.
So for what is Catalyst a good example? If I understand RJBS said it is a good example for a distro that *does not* get split up while from David I understood it *did*. So am I just falling in the crack between US and UK English or did you really say the opposite? Gabor
