You can bundle a Build.PL (Module::Build) and use it to generate the dist, and 
you'll get a shiny meta file :) Or you can drop EU::MM and use only M::B which 
has some transition mechanism for EU::MM users. However I prefer to use a 
native Makefile.PL...

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:53:38 -0700
> Von: "Bill Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: module-authors@perl.org
> Betreff: Re: Need help improving my Kwalitee

> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> >> My module Number::Format has some red areas in its Kwalitee report
> >> http://cpants.perl.org/dist/kwalitee/Number-Format
> >>
> >> When I release 1.60, I tried to fix a lot of the kwalitee issues with
> >> the previous version, 1.52.  However, it appears that some of my
> >> "fixes" didn't work.  For example, my META.yml file was barebones in
> >> 1.52, and I wanted to bring it up to modern standards.  I could not
> >> find any tool that would help me generate it, so I cobbled one
> >> together by hand using examples from other modules.  Yet I still see
> >> dings against the kwalitee there.
> >
> > Maybe cpants_lint.pl (comes with Module::CPANTS::Anaylse) is helpfull.
> > Although I have to admit that there are some nasty bugs in cpants ATM,
> > and I'm still low on tuits. I will spend some time on cpants before
> > YAPC, though...
> 
> I looked into installing Module::CPANTS::Analyse but it has a zillion
> dependencies, most of which I'm not familiar with.  I generally try to
> avoid installing Perl modules without good reason, and prefer those
> that are not heavily dependent on others because it can make it
> horribly difficult to debug problems... but I will think about it.

-- 
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to