No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-)
Atsushi Eno
Rafael Mizrahi wrote:
Atsushi,
WOW, managed ICU,
Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU
implementation ?
rafi
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi
Eno
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM
To: Ilya Kharmatsky
Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation
(CompareInfo) support
Hi Ilya,
Great news! Thank you!
Thank you too, for all your help on it :-)
Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare
results
to
"old" and may be MS.Net performance results?
Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono,
but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will
have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is
what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code.
But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and
managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get
icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the
latest code works fine).
Atsushi Eno
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
