Dave: > I really wish you'd use the Moose repo like everyone else. It makes it > a lot easier for me to review your code that way, and probably for > others who aren't too git-savvy.
Oh, sorry. I forked it from force of habit. Well, let's get back to the subject. Although I implemented the '-strict' option, I don't like it as Alexander does. Rather, I prefer make_immutable(strict_construcotr => 1). Dave said that constructor strictness should not be tied to immutability, but I don't think so. This is because existing options to make_immutable, namely constructor_name and inline_construcotr, etc., are irrelevant to immutability. The fact that those existing options are passed to make_immutable is not logically reasonable. 'strict_constructor' may be irrelevant to immutability, but there is no reason not to be tied to make_immutable. -- Goro Fuji (藤 吾郎)
