Well, they're both present for my latest test, but as I posted earlier, I originally had an install.rdf and no install.js, and it was complaining that there was no install script.
While I agree that your assessment is in line with what I expect the behavior be, sadly, it's not the case. I'm perfectly willing to believe that I've somehow misassembled the XPI file or something, but if that's the case, the error messages I'm seeing are badly misleading. "Christian Biesinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Paul Schmidt wrote: >> So it looks like FF 1.0.4 does *not* ignore an install.js per the docs, >> but rather, expects a different syntax (?) than the example shown. > > It uses install.rdf if present, otherwise it uses install.js. One of the > files must exist. > > The syntax should be the one described there... _______________________________________________ Mozilla-xpinstall mailing list Mozilla-xpinstall@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-xpinstall
