A good starting point, imho, would be to download an xpi from
UMO/Addons.mozilla.org whatever; (such as chatzilla or something) and
compare it's directory structure, roughly with yours.
install.rdf MUST be in the top-level directory of the xpi for example.
(as in if you were to expand the xpi with an unzip program install.rdf
would be in your current directory by default.)
~Justin Wood (Callek)
Paul Schmidt wrote:
Well, they're both present for my latest test, but as I posted earlier, I
originally had an install.rdf and no install.js, and it was complaining that
there was no install script.
While I agree that your assessment is in line with what I expect the
behavior be, sadly, it's not the case.
I'm perfectly willing to believe that I've somehow misassembled the XPI file
or something, but if that's the case, the error messages I'm seeing are
badly misleading.
"Christian Biesinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Schmidt wrote:
So it looks like FF 1.0.4 does *not* ignore an install.js per the docs,
but rather, expects a different syntax (?) than the example shown.
It uses install.rdf if present, otherwise it uses install.js. One of the
files must exist.
The syntax should be the one described there...
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-xpinstall mailing list
Mozilla-xpinstall@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-xpinstall
