> 
> > > we might add a "relaxed" option which would not waste these bits).
> > 
> > ... and we would choke many hardware players from playing LAME encoded mp3s!
> > 
> > I think, we shouldn't ignore the buffer considerations as stated in the ISO
> > documentation.
> > 
> > >
> > > Mark
> > 
> > Robert
> > --
> 
> I think that if it's only an option, then it's ok.

If you're not going to be iso-mpeg compliant, you can change other things
as well. So why not just use vorbis or something? Standards are good, use
them. Even if some parts are braindead, they're at least standard.

Ciao,

Segher

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to