For encouragement, we're already using TooLame in
day-to-day operations, so improvements on this will
be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Bill

Patrick De Smet wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > For those that care
> 
> I do, IMHO layer II is still high(est) quality, high yet nicely
> reduced kbps, rel. fast, and, no lots-of-options compression ;)
> 
> >         toolame02f layer II encoder released. Did a little bit of code
> > cleaning and re-organising, and its now 15% faster to encode (psy 1).  Still
> > plenty more to do, still no time to do it. *sigh*
> 
> (sigh^2...Maybe now) I will get round to finally discussing with Mike and
> adding some things to toolame; my students and me got some very nice
> results speed-optimizing the layer II bitalloc code, but it could still
> use some further work, I am looking into that now.
> 
> I hope during the next weeks, further details will be discussed a bit
> further on:
> http://telin.rug.ac.be/~pds/mpeg_audio/xlame/take2.html
> 
> regards,
> Patrick.
> 
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

--
Bill Eldridge
Radio Free Asia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to