At 00:28 00/05/23 +0200, Roel VdB wrote: > Hello, > > I did some test with "-Z", and must say I'm really impressed. Maybe a > little bit more bits to hard parts, but I've found no things that > sound really off. > > The size benefit is great! > > Just my opinion, many may differ :) Thanx, Roel. I'll be this feature as default for -h or -q 2 and upper setting and remove -Z option. I think the next step is subblock gain. I'll merge the feature from my snapshot to the current LAME. maybe that will be another "-Z" option. --- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algorithm Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algorithm ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale algori... Leonardo Stern
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: new scalefac_scale... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] I'd like "-Z" to be... Roel VdB
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] I'd like "-Z&... Takehiro TOMINAGA
- [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (win32) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1 (wi... Istvan Varga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with -q1... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Bug with... Istvan Varga