I normaly use -h -k -b 192 -ms for encoding. If I change -b 192 to --abr 192 i get files with average about 180-182kbit (about 45% frames at 160 and 10% above 192). Is the reason for this bits that was wasted in CBR before ? If its not, which parameters should be used if you want files that only go below 192 if its caused by bits otherwise wasted in CBR ? (To ensure that you with ABR *always* get a better result than with CBR) Thanks, Peter -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Francois du Toit
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Mark Taylor
- Re: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Peter Olufsen
- Re: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Mark Taylor
- Re: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Ivo
- Sv: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Peter Olufsen
- Re: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Mark Taylor
- Re[2]: Sv: [MP3 ENCODER] ABR vs VBR Dmitry
- [MP3 ENCODER] Why I think 3.84a... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Why I thi... Robert Hegemann
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Why I ... Roel VdB
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Why I ... Mathew Hendry
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Wh... Robert Hegemann