Actually, Ivan, that is what I was asking about (I hope I didn't sound too demanding, didn't mean to...) :)
We're not even seeing the option for an upgrade, so if you are, and you're currently at 1511, that tells me that we probably should be seeing it. Thanks, I appreciate it. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Lindenfeld, Ivan <ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com> wrote: > This is not the definitive answer OP is demanding, but our production 1511 > site is showing 1610 under Updates and Servicing after running the > Powershell script to trigger it. All prerequisites have passed. > > > > We are upgrading next Monday evening, so you will have an answer then! J > > > > Ivan Lindenfeld > > Fidelity National > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *the codepoets > *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:46 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console > > > > Again, we are at 1511 in our environment. Microsoft is stating that 1511 > should be the minimum for upgrading to 1610. I am asking specificially if > anyone has been able to go from 1511 to 1610 directly. > > > > Adn yes, I have re-cheched for updates after running the PowerShell. (As > this is 1511, I have to restart the SMS_DMP_DOWNLOADER service to do so, as > there is no right-click menu). > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kamerman, Sol <skamer...@babson.edu> > wrote: > > I just tried the script a few minutes ago in my test environment 1606, and > 1610 appeared almost immediately after I checked for updates. > > > > Sol > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *the codepoets > *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:21 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console > > > > Thanks for the reply Sherry. It's been 2 days since the script was run. > Still nothing. > > > > Was your lab running 1511 or something newer? > > > > My colleague has told me he's seeing a version check in one of the logs > and thinks that's what is denying us access to 1610. So I am just trying to > confirm that we, at 1511, cannot go directly to 1610. > > > > Erik > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sherry Kissinger < > sherrylkissin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > in my lab; after running the script; I noticed 1610 wasn't there right > away either. I don't recall how long it was--I got distracted by > production. by the time I got back to the lab it was the next day--and it > was there. You may just need to wait longer? > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:23 PM, the codepoets <thecodepo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We have 1511 installed and seemingly working fine in both our LAB and > Production. I see 1602 and 1606 in both consoles, but not 1610. I know 1511 > is stated as the minimum, but has anyone confirmed this and done an in > console upgrade from 1511 to 1610? (And yes, I've already tried running the > PowerShell script to make the update available with no luck. The script > completes fine but there is no change in either environment) > > > > Thanks, > > Erik > > > > > > -- > > Thank you, > > Sherry Kissinger > > > My Parameters: Standardize. Simplify. Automate > Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com, http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger, > http://www.smguru.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient > of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message > and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any > manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. > >