That’s unfortunate. Was hoping for some improvements to this in 1706. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:23 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files
I upgraded to 1706 a few weeks back. I enabled express updates and I am not seeing the express folders being created when downloading the patches. I have made all of the modifications necessary including the client settings and it doesn’t appear to be working correctly even with the latest build and client. Is anyone else seeing this? Are the certain conditions that have to be met in order for this to work? Sol From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Corkill, Daniel Sent: Tuesday, 12 September, 2017 6:06 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files Hi all, Do we know if this is fixed now in 1706? I’ve held off enabling express updates and now that we’re on 1706 I’ll enable it if it’s working obviously. Daniel. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 8:11 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files Not really a ‘bug’ – just a lack of understanding how BITS works by whoever wrote that piece.. ‘Should be fixed in the 1706 Production release although it’s still broken in the TP. Can’t speak for WSUS standalone – but don’t think Express updates apply to Win7 anyway? I’ve seen various threads complaining about performance though – so I would wait a while before enabling this again. Phil From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: 20 July 2017 18:57 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing> Feedback<http://aka.ms/SafetyTipsFeedback> Should be fixed in the next version of ConfigMgr. Known issue. Basically you get a BITS job for each “delta” in the patch, making it very slow… look at it as “free” bandwidth management! 😊 //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Fast, David D. Sent: den 20 juli 2017 17:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files Is this “bug” specific to the SCCM SUP implementation of Express Updates? We recently enabled Express Updates on our WSUS server (servicing mainly W7 OS), and I am less than impressed on the results. It seems that clients take longer to download/install updates now than they did before. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mead, Renae (DTMB) Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:19 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files We are having issues getting Windows 10 distributed to slower sites, so we reached out to Microsoft, which suggested using Express updates. We turned it on and during testing experienced severe performance issues. It took 40 hours to download and install patches using Express Updates. Another machine on the same subnet, same DP, NOT using express updates took 15 minutes to download, install, and reboot. Not to mention the package grew from 4GB to 24 GB. We reached out to Microsoft with our testing results and expressed our concerns; they confirmed “there was a bug that they found that causes clients to create numerous BITS jobs (one for each byte range for the deltas to the package). Each of those jobs has it's own overhead, and latency amplifies that.” They did confirm the fix for express updates is in escrow for the next Current Branch release, which should be in the next month or so. As others have stated Express updates are not ready for prime-time. Thanks, Renae Mead DTMB IS OA Enterprise Services mea...@michigan.gov<mailto:mea...@michigan.gov> (517) 636-0761 Office (517) 388-2737 Mobile From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 10:11 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] 1702 Express Install Files Is anyone using this feature in SCCM 1702? I was really looking forward to getting this up and running after the 1702 upgrade but I am a little disappointed with the results I am seeing. I understand the initial download is larger and I am okay with that, my patch package jumped from 13.1GB to nearly 44GB so the 2-3X size increase was pretty accurate. My issue is the time that it is taking to install the cumulative update, it is taking almost 3+ hours on my test machines. The machines are all W10 1607 with the latest April update applied, everything in the log files (deltadownload.log) indicates all is well and they are using the express files to install. It just takes forever to apply the update. Is anyone else experiencing very long install times using the express install files? I am going to test a 1703 machine today to see if it makes any difference. Thanks Carl ________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. **************************************************************************** The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may be confidential, private or the subject of copyright. If you have received this email in error please notify Logan City Council, by replying to the sender or calling +61 7 3412 3412 and delete all copies of the e-mail and any attachments. To view Logan City Council's Privacy Collection Notice, please visit www.logan.qld.gov.au<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.logan.qld.gov.au&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.beardsley%40dhgllp.com%7C651bb6eeac5b49d5ba3b08d4fa9a3e3d%7Cd0bcae41470b4a069f20d1759ceb2b99%7C0%7C0%7C636408987766044486&sdata=y%2Fcf1yOXUdBuviitIFNufMrz%2BRjhBqDObPE9yjhx0%2Bg%3D&reserved=0> or click on the following link http://www.logan.qld.gov.au/home/terms-of-use<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.logan.qld.gov.au%2Fhome%2Fterms-of-use&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.beardsley%40dhgllp.com%7C651bb6eeac5b49d5ba3b08d4fa9a3e3d%7Cd0bcae41470b4a069f20d1759ceb2b99%7C0%7C0%7C636408987766044486&sdata=sobn6i3U4%2B5veJEYxUzZ%2BjtNtLfRR8rLLWBCW%2BjaM3c%3D&reserved=0>. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.
