Chris, Discussion of draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p is on the IETF 6man WG mailing list. But please do chime in. Operator input very welcomed.
Ron Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mathias Seiler > <mathias.sei...@mironet.ch> wrote: >> Hi >> >> In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like to know >> what is your experience with IPv6 in this regard. >> >> I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link >> between two routers. This works great but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 >> - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong. >> >> So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;) > > <cough>draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt</cough> > > (<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt>) > > why not just ping your vendors to support this, and perhaps chime in > on v6ops about wanting to do something sane with ptp link addressing? > :) > > -Chris > >