On Apr 19, 2010, at 1:22 31PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
> On 4/19/2010 10:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
>> so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
>> not operational considerations.
>
> LSN is not trivial.
>
Also remember the abuse/blacklist/CALEA problem with NAT -- you have to log
every connection by port number, and hope that the complaints you get mention
source port.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
