CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism through IPv6 At the end (IPv6 at home) you will need at list : Dual stack or NAT64/ DNS64
My 2 cents On Apr 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support v6 >> would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through that :( > > IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion. Would > you be less upset if there was IPv6 access and CPE based DS Lite (ie your > IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)? > > CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth is > IPv6. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se >
