On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Dominik Guder <o...@guder.org> wrote:
> Am 18.05.2011 22:27, schrieb Martin Aliger:
> > I do not see problem _targeting_ "net-4.0-client" Framework. No real need
> to
> > be hosted in that, imho.
> >
> > Martin
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> +1. IMHO we could require full .net 4.0 install for runtime since we
> need SDK anyways.
>
> Besides of this it is easy to build your own log4net and remove web
> related Appenders. I did this as a proof of concept. And I'm wondering
> why nobody is going to fix this.
>
> So far
> Dominik
>
>
Your wondering is as valid today as it was last year when I noted that
log4net seems to be a "mature" product abandoned after .NET 2.x. It turns
out I was not completely correct. There has actually been a commit in the
last year -- 7 months ago. You have to go back almost two years to find
another. I have no choice but to support .NET 4 so I moved on to NLog some
time ago for my own projects and have been quite happy with it. It would be
nice if log4net were more actively maintained.
Good Luck,
Carlos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
