There's been a lot of good debate here concerning the Boomberg boycott. I have to say that I haven't seen the cartoon that accompanied the call so that may have changed the direction of my thought on this - I only get a text version of the list. I cannot speak for the intentions of those who initiated the call I can only speak for my interpretation, which is neither right or wrong unless you consider Rob's comment about "truth" seriously (i don't - and by the way Rob your giving us a false choice between absolute truth and relativism - maybe get caught up on you postmod theory huh). anyway, my interpretation was that the boycott was not focussed on Bloombergs jewishness. There's many reasons why Bloomberg is a good choice of target.
Let's change his name for a minute to John Smith O.k. John Smith is a billionaire media mogul whose networks run a constant propaganda campaign for the support of Israeli policy in occupied palestine John Smith is the mayor of New York city, one of the most visual political posts in the world. John Smith uses his post to vocalize agressively and more than many of his contemporaries his support for sending more U.S. tax dollars to fund Israeli war crimes even while cutting city services, slashing school and health programs, and laying off workers in New York City. John Smith is also is in the fine art business and very clearly represents the corporatization of the art market and all the harm that that does in controlling the parameters of what art can be. Seems like an ideal target to me if his name was John Smith. So the question to me is - should we NOT boycott him BECAUSE his name is Bloomberg and not John Smith? So if this protest were against Rupert Murdoch - who is not nearly as good of a target because to my knowledge has no investment in the art world and therefore would make little sense as institutional critique - then it would be fine because he's not jewish. I'm giving everyone's opinions an honest appraisal but I'm not coming around yet. Of course I didn't see the cartoon either - maybe that was the offesive part and i missed it.
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour