thanks ruth :) it was high time you were on there!

h : )


On 05.06.2017 10:46, ruth catlow wrote:
>
> Excellent blog post Helen - for wide sharing! And an inspiring effort
> from you Munich wiki-feminists. The emancipatory punch of Woolf and De
> Beauvoir powers-through in your work.
> And this is before we get onto the question of class-exclusion.
>
> It such a humungous mind-melon-twister to argue for one's own
> notability and a bit overwhelming to have you do it on my behalf. So
> much work! A massive thank you!
>
> Ruth
>
>
> On 03/06/17 12:08, helen varley jamieson wrote:
>>
>> hi everyone,
>>
>> a couple of months ago there was a wikipedia edit-a-thon here in
>> munich that was attended by myself, gretta louw, tamiko thiel & quite
>> a lot of others. it was a good event, altho somewhat frustrating - as
>> many wikipedia editing experiences are!! (i blogged about it here:
>> http://creative-catalyst.com/serendipity/index.php?/archives/195-whats-wrong-with-wikipedia.html)
>>
>> anyway the good news is that as a result, there are now 2 new
>> wikipedia articles:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Catlow
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gretta_Louw
>>
>> & some editing was done on other pages:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamiko_Thiel
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Varley_Jamieson
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Abrahams
>>
>> (there was also a page created for Susanne Wiegner but it has been
>> deleted; we might have also worked on some other pages but i can't
>> remember now ...)
>>
>> gretta's and my articles both still have tags saying "multiple
>> issues", despite having lots of quite reputable references. mine
>> needs someone who does not have a "close connection" to me (i don't
>> know how wikipedia defines "close") to add more secondary sources.
>> gretta's article is an orphan, meaning it needs links from other
>> wikipedia pages to her article. it also says it needs additional
>> citations, it already has more than plenty of male artists who don't
>> have the same tags on their pages so i think once it's no longer an
>> orphan we should be able to get rid of that.
>>
>> so, if anyone out there has idle time on their hands & feels like
>> entering into the twisted labyrinth of wikipedia editing, i invite
>> you to contribute to improving these articles :)
>>
>> h : )
>>
>> -- 
>> helen varley jamieson
>> he...@creative-catalyst.com <mailto:he...@creative-catalyst.com>
>> http://www.creative-catalyst.com
>> http://www.upstage.org.nz
>>
>> *We have a situation, Coventry!
>> <http://www.wehaveasituation.net/?p=1402>*
>> 24 November 2016
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
> -- 
> Co-founder Co-director
> Furtherfield
>
> www.furtherfield.org
>
> +44 (0) 77370 02879
>
> Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i
>
> Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows, labs, &
> debates
> around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997
>
> Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee
> registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.
> Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand Arcade,
> Tally Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

-- 
helen varley jamieson
he...@creative-catalyst.com <mailto:he...@creative-catalyst.com>
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.upstage.org.nz

*We have a situation, Coventry! <http://www.wehaveasituation.net/?p=1402>*
24 November 2016

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to