True, but that's not what mtexmfstart.pdf says...
On Feb 6, 2005, at 9:14 PM, VnPenguin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:06:21 +0100, Thomas A. Schmitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm wondering if this is a bug: I tried to play around with the
texmfstart script, but couldn't get it to work. I think the latest
cont-tmf.zip installs those files with wrong permissions. Here's what
I
got:
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 15k Jan 6 13:41 concheck.rb
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 25k Jan 28 09:28 ctxtools.rb
drwxr-xr-x 3 tas 102 Feb 6 21:00 exa
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 21k Dec 20 21:31 texmfstart.rb
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 6.5k Jun 14 2004 texsync.rb
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 23k Oct 15 19:15 textools.rb
-rw-r--r-- 1 tas 13k Oct 27 18:27 xmltools.rb
drwxr-xr-x 3 tas 102 Feb 6 21:00 xmpl
same is true for scripts/perl/ Shouldn't they all have permission 755?
Not need IMHO if you run the script by using "perl script.pl". The
same for ruby :)
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
