Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Taco,

isn't this a bit too general?

Yes, I have simplified considerably, but I believe my statements
are a good guideline for users that do not have in-depth knowledge
of the workings of ConTeXt, esp. those that are used to LaTeX.

But AFAICS, the Berry-namimg scheme is not necessary even for LaTeX. Or am I being overoptimistic?


Not quite necessary I think, but it sure makes using fontinst easier
if you do. And there is an analogous situation for the Hagen-naming
scheme and texfont ;-)

Cheers,

Taco

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Reply via email to