2007/12/5, Arthur Reutenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > No! "deo" ist modern German in old orthography (pre-2005). > > OK, so I guess that's what RFC 4646 suggests de-1996 for -- I suppose > the reform was first introduced in 1996 and adopted only later? See > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4646.txt, page 13 (Mojca, the > preceding paragraph is for you ;-) >
Maybe; we've now the 42th reform of the reform - a lot is back to pre-reform orthography (or both styles are allowed). 2005 was only a estimation - AFAIR in 2005 the reformed orthography became standard for schools and public authorities. Greetlings, Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
