On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:39 -0500 (EST) Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine. See https://mail.gna.org/public/muse-el-discuss/2008-01/msg00001.html thread. > :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt > follow this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say > > \catcode`\_ = 11 > > on the top of your file and then _ will be a letter in both text and > math mode (which basically means that you will have to use \sb to get > subscript in math mode. Hmm, not ideal... > It is possible to define something along the lines of underscore.sty > in latex, so that _ is treated as a letter in text mode, and as a > subscript indicator in math mode, but, read below. I do not remember having ever problem with underscore in LaTeX. > Shouldn't such function names be written as \type{gtk_xxxx} when muse > converts the document to ConTeXt? In that case the _ will be > preserved. Right. They will fix default in muse and use \type{_} as value for underscore. Thank you for your input. Sincerely, Gour ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
