Corin Royal Drummond wrote: > Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and every > one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that documentation > is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully active > mailing list, and what used to be decent docs from 2001/2002 timeframe. > But yes, it's a steep hill to climb, made worth it only by the relative > awesomeness of ConTeXt.
You missed the reference manual rewrite effort (which is now in remission mostly because of an extremely depressing lack of user feedback). http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
