On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Rory Molinari wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and
every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that
documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully
active
mailing list, and what used to be decent docs from 2001/2002
timeframe. But yes, it's a steep hill to climb, made worth it only
by the relative
awesomeness of ConTeXt.
You missed the reference manual rewrite effort (which is now in
remission mostly because of an extremely depressing lack of user
feedback).
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation
Hi Taco,
I'm sorry that I haven't given much feedback on the documentation
project. I got through the Typography chapter, but then was so
confounded by the Fonts chapter that I didn't feel able to give
comments. I will make another attempt.
Cheers,
Rory
Hi, I'd like to second what Rory said. I was delighted by my first
reading of the typography chapter, and had not seen the font chapter
until you posted the link above, Taco. I'm also sorry not to have
chimed in before.
Dave
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
