On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > luigi scarso wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz < >> thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de <mailto:thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de>> wrote: >> >> >> If they fails, >> then we must find a solution . >> >> >> No, the mkii solution was on the level of the map-files (just use >> <<font.pfb instead of <font.pfb, and it will be fully embedded); >> that is not applicable to mkiv. >> >> so "houston, we have a problem here" . >> I think we need Taco , or go tthrough luatex-ref.pdf . >> > >
> it's no problem to provide that feature in mkiv, but i need some real > string arguments as well as to be sure that i'll never be bothered by side > effects of fonts not being in a pdf file > Fonts not included can sometimes speeds up things when you are coding, but I never use this feature -- too much dangerous. I never used full inclusion too, but it's a prepress job (and yes, I have a prepress office); there is also ghostscript that does this kind of distiller stuffs. Full inclusion can be useful, at least to cover the same feature of pdftex. (my 1cent) -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
