Am 19.03.2012 um 09:38 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

> I just bought the new Lucida font from TUG and installed it in my local texmf 
> under fonts/opentype/bh/lucidaot/
> Then I did:
>   mtxrun --generate
>   mtxrun --script font --reload
> to be sure the new install will be picked up by ConTeXt mkiv.
> 
> I think I did read somewhere that mkiv will prefer otf above pfb files, if 
> these otfs are present.

It’s the users decision which font should be chosen because each font has a 
unique
name and when you want a automatic replacement (like for latin modern and 
computer
modern in mkii) you have to tell this the system.

> However, after running \setupbodyfont[lucida,10pt] the log shows the old 
> pfb's used:
> </Users/hans/TeX/texmf/fonts/type1/yandy/lucida/lbr.pfb> instead of an otf?
> 
> What could have happended? What am I doing wrong?
> 
> By the way I do not see the lucida math fonts in the package. Are these 
> missing?

The new version of the lucida fonts use different names for the typescript, we 
have now:

- “lucida” for the old type1 version,
- “lucidaot” for the new opentype version and
- “lucidanova” as alternative name for the opentype version.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to