On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Troy Henderson <thend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never >> finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf. > > > This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by > "purchase" I really mean "re-purchase) the OTF versions in order to use my > Lucida fonts. This is a bit discouraging. > > Troy > We just purchased the OTF versions. I'd rather have TeX developers focus on getting OTF support right than preserving legacy capabilities. For years we have been able to format old docs with current TeX systems. Now I just hope the old docs will work without too many changes using OTF versions of the fonts. > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- George N. White III <aa...@chebucto.ns.ca> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
