On 7/15/2014 11:59 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 19:29, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl
<mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>> wrote:
quite some sub-systems are described in their own manuals (fonts,
tables, xml, ...) and these manuals are quite up to date (and easier
to maintain than one big fat manual
also, additional documentation is something that users need to
participate in (just pick a topic)
even if it has high priority, that doesn't mean that those involved
have much free time left to do that next to their regular work (as
usual most development is done in spare time)
so, patience is needed,
I like ConTeXt (still do, I liked its approach when I first encountered
it). But the project is more the ongoing private tinkering of a small
in-crowd (that communicates with some followers).
ConTeXt is managed a bit like a small group of researchers sharing a
couple of complex and undocumented models/programs and tinkering with
them as they go along. It’s an activity without formal design, but with
a lot of trial-and-error/testing.
Given that status (and the fact that it has had that status for over a
/decennium/), I don’t expect it to ever become a serious product that is
(semi-)professionally managed. I prefer content over management every
day, but something like this needs some minimal management. That
requires both time (=money) and capabilities. Besides, the tinkering
researchers may not be inclined to do that, they want to tinker.
BTW, you can’t be serious asking the /users/ to provide the
documentation, can you?
Well, you need to keep this in mind:
- we are using it ourselves (already for a long time) so we depend on it
and so we keep it going
- we spend most of our company time on development and support .. and we
live with that
- our roadmap does *not* include getting big (with open source as
stepping stone), *not* messing with users by selling ourselves after a
while, and *not* splitting between 'context for users' and 'context
professional or enterprise', so everyone gets what we have (which also
means that documentation will always be behind!)
- we have no big projects that pay for development (from which we can
then work on documentation) .. in fact, our projects are rather niche
and special
- we're quite satisfied with the users (they are demanding and creative)
... context never aimed at one-time-users
Now, we don't ask users to provide documentation, but on the other hand,
if you look at latex, lost of documentation starts at users.
Maybe some day I find more time ...
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
