[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.] > On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>>> On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote: >>> >>>> The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it >>>> behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a similar >>>> option? >>> >>> No. You have to use \colon. >> >> It would be nice with such an option, as it helps the readability of the >> input files. > > already for some years i'm thinking of something similar to openmath > dictionaries i.e. in many cases when one writes math it is in some field that > is consistent within a document, say logic or engineering > > it is rather trivial to support something > > \setupmathematics[domain=logic] > > or so, where we automatically relate the math class with the symbols used, > something that becomes more important once we start coding in unicode instead > of using names > > but ... in order to provide this, i need information about useful categories Unicode provides one such category. The reason is all math characters are added and in that process analyzed. I worked with Taco on that in the late 1990s. So one main option, which might be the simplest, to assume that the input is UTF-8. Oen can the added ASCII command names, based on the Unicode names. In addition some options for special needs and legacy. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
