Hi,
The beta has a bit adapted note interactivity (rather tricky as these
inserts have their own weirdness)
% \setupnotes[interaction=no]
% \setupnotes[interaction=yes]
% \setupnotes[interaction=text]
% \setupnotes[interaction=number]
\setupnotes[interaction=all]
\setupinteraction[state=start,focus=width,option=name] % option probably
not needed
\starttext
\dorecurse{10}{note #1\footnote[reference:#1]{\input ward \input
tufte\relax} }
\par
\goto{OEPS 3}[reference:3]
\goto{OEPS 10}[reference:10]
\stoptext
I can't check much (as I don't know what to expect, but there is no real
definition of qualitative behaviour there anyway) but this is what can
be done. I have no clue to what extent complex interactions between
footnote splitting and their content can interfere.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
