> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>>> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic styles. So
>>>> perhaps the TeX commands should expand to these:
>>> what tex commands ... we're talking characters and they don't expand
>>
>> If one writes ASCII ${\bf x} {\bi x}$, it would expand to the expected
>> Unicode $𝐱 𝒙$.
>
> That is already the case.
Does it cover those listed here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
