> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>>> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic styles. So
>>>> perhaps the TeX commands should expand to these:
>>> what tex commands ... we're talking characters and they don't expand
>>
>> If one writes ASCII ${\bf x} {\bi x}$, it would expand to the expected
>> Unicode $𝐱 𝒙$.
>
> That is already the case.
FYI, I found a neat trick:
If one does not know the Unicode character, because the translation is correct,
one can typeset using legacy TeX commands, and copy from the output PDF. It can
then be used in the input file, if one so likes.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
