On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
There is a similar possibility, at least in Metapost? For simpler
pictures it would probably suffice ....
The ability to pass parameters to metapost has been around since the
beginning. See the metafun manual for details (search for MPvar). For
simple images, you can also do:
\define[1]\Circle{\startMPcode draw fullcircle scaled #1*cm; \stopMPcode}
\Circle{1} \Circle{2} \Circle{3}
Is there a way to pass the ConTeXt parameter which influenced the
creation of the Asymptote image? My point eg. the ability to define
macros, which gave its parameters to Asymptote procedure or function and
depending on these parameters, the image created by Asymptote looked
differently.
In principle, something similar to \MPvar can work for asymptote as well
(or one could do parse the content in Lua rather than expand variables in
TeX).
Before starting work on an illustrative example I am asking, whether it
makes sense to deal with such a thing ... I suppose the impossibility of
combining asymptote code and such Lua code (or not?).
ConTeXt and Metapost are very well integrated, even in MkII. The same
ideas could work with other graphic backends as well (Asymptote, tikz, and
others). But it does require a good knowledge of the graphics package.
I am willing to write the code at the context end, if someone who knows
asymptote can tell me what needs to be done at the asymptote end.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
