On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:23 PM, David Cournapeau <da...@silveregg.co.jp>wrote:
> Jarrod Millman wrote: > > Just > > to be clear, I would prefer to see the ABI-breaking release be called > > 2.0. I don't see why we have to get the release out in three weeks, > > though. I think it would be better to use this opportunity to take > > some time to make sure we get it right. > > As a compromise, what about the following: > - remove ABI-incompatible changes for 1.4.x > +1 > - release a 1.5.0 marked as experimental, with everything that > Travis > wants to put in. It would be a preview for python 3k as well, so it > conveys the idea that it is experimental pretty well. > I've got to agree with Darren here. 2.0 marks the API break, nothing more, nothing less. That's what the major number is for. > - the 1.6.x branch would be a polished 1.5.x. > > No one expects a x.0.0 release to be polished ;) > The advantages is that 1.5.0 can be push relatively early, but we would > still keep 1.4.0 as the "stable" release, against which every other > binary installer should be built (scipy, mpl). > > Just push out 2.0 early. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion