I wonder: how hard would it be to create a more 21th-century oriented BLAS, relying more on code generation tools, and perhaps LLVM/JITting?
Wouldn't we get ten times the portability with one-tenth the lines of code? Or is there too much dark magic going on in BLAS for such an approach to come close enough to hand-tuned performance? On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 11/04/14 04:44, Matthew Brett wrote: > > > I've been working on a general wiki page on building numerical stuff on > Windows: > > > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numerical-software-on-Windows > > I am worried that the conclusion will be that there is no viable BLAS > alternative on Windows... > > > Sturla > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
