numpy-discussion  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Frédéric Bastien
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview? (1.7 compatibility issue) Kathleen M Tacina
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview? (1.7 compatibility issue) T J
  • [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Jonathan T. Niehof
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Benjamin Root
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Robert Kern
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Robert Kern
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Larsen, Brian A
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking for views (was: Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or aview?) josef . pktd
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Olivier Delalleau
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Luis Pedro Coelho
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue) Fernando Perez
• [Numpy-discussion] Anyone have a cached copy of NA-discussion-status? Nathaniel Smith
• [Numpy-discussion] stable sort for structured dtypes? Benjamin Root
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] stable sort for structured dtypes? Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] stable sort for structured dtypes? Benjamin Root
• [Numpy-discussion] CEP 1001 - Custom PyTypeObject extensions Dag Sverre Seljebotn
• [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer mark florisson
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer mark florisson
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer mark florisson
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer mark florisson
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Frédéric Bastien
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer David Cournapeau
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer mark florisson
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Matthew Brett
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Matthew Brett
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer Travis Oliphant
• [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Gael Varoquaux
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA-mask interactions with existing C code Jim Bosch
• [Numpy-discussion] spurious space in printing record arrays? Benjamin Root
• [Numpy-discussion] read line mixed with string and number? Chao YUE
• [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Chris Barker
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Scott Ransom
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Inati, Souheil (NIH/NIMH) [E]
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masking through generator arrays Nathaniel Smith
• Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation roles in the numpy/scipy documentation editor Joe Harrington
• [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Gael Varoquaux
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Matthew Brett
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Dag Sverre Seljebotn
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Matthew Brett
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Paul Ivanov
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Nathaniel Smith
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Benjamin Root
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Richard Hattersley
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Scott Sinclair
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Scott Sinclair
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Fernando Perez
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Scott Sinclair
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Fernando Perez
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data wrap-up and request for comments Travis Oliphant
• [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Announce: scikit-learn v0.11 Gael Varoquaux
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Announce: scikit-learn v0.11 klo uo
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Announce: scikit-learn v0.11 Gael Varoquaux
• [Numpy-discussion] Announce: scikit-learn v0.11 Gael Varoquaux
• [Numpy-discussion] Documentation roles in the numpy/scipy documentation editor Tim Cera
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation roles in the numpy/scipy documentation editor Ralf Gommers
• [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion: OK on numpy 1.5.0, fails on 1.6.1 Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion: OK on numpy 1.5.0, fails on 1.6.1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion: OK on numpy 1.5.0, fails on 1.6.1 Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion: OK on numpy 1.5.0, fails on 1.6.1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion: OK on numpy 1.5.0, fails on 1.6.1 Travis Oliphant
• [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion and gcc 4.1.2 Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy_quaternion and gcc 4.1.2 Charles R Harris
• [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage? Chris Ball
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage? Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage? josef . pktd
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage? Ralf Gommers
• [Numpy-discussion] ANN Scikit-learn 0.11-beta Gael Varoquaux
• [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Till Stensitzki
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository Charles R Harris
• [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [SIAM-CSE] pOSKI - Autotuner for parallel sparse-matrix-vector multiplication Fernando Perez
• [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [SIAM-CSE] pOSKI - Autotuner for parallel sparse-matrix-vector Fernando Perez
• [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Paul Anton Letnes
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Paul Anton Letnes
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Derek Homeier
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Paul Anton Letnes
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Paul Anton Letnes
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Christoph Gohlke
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Christoph Gohlke
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Andreas H.
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Frédéric Bastien
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Benjamin Root
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Sandro Tosi
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Ralf Gommers
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1 Orion Poplawski
• [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Ilan Schnell
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Ilan Schnell
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Mark Wiebe
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type David Cournapeau
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Charles R Harris
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Neal Becker
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Travis Oliphant
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Tom Aldcroft
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] Quaternion data type Val Kalatsky
• [Numpy-discussion] 2012 SciPy Bioinformatics Workshop Chris Mueller
• [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Moroney, Catherine M (388D)
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Moroney, Catherine M (388D)
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Keith Goodman
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Perry Greenfield
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Paul Anton Letnes
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Keith Goodman
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Moroney, Catherine M (388D)
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Keith Goodman
  • Re: [Numpy-discussion] timing results (was: record arrays initialization) Paul Anton Letnes
• [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: ... numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so: undefined symbol: zungqr_ Kliment
• [Numpy-discussion] Status of np.bincount Robert Elsner

• Earlier messages
• Later messages