On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Julian has raised the question of including numpy_ufunc in numpy 1.9. I
> don't feel strongly one way or the other, but it doesn't seem to be
> finished yet and 1.10 might be a better place to work out the remaining
> problems along with the astropy folks testing possible uses.
>
> Thoughts?
>

It's already in, so do you mean not using? Would help to know what the
issue is, because it's finished enough that it's already used in a released
version of scipy (in sparse matrices).

Ralf
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to