+1 to posting it as part of the documentation. I also like the idea of numfocus hosting the whole collection of them locally so that we can just link to them.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 19:01 Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Hi all, there wasn't much feedback on this FSA, but I want to point out >> that it's actually quite important for the project. >> >> Maybe everyone already thought about this when the governance model was >> agreed on (it does include a NumFOCUS subcommittee after all), but if not: >> read / think /ask question fast, because we're moving forward with signing >> of the agreement with the people listed at >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/dev/governance/people.html#numfocus-subcommittee. >> >> > > The document is now signed. No other project with an FSA seems to have > done this (yet), but I think it would be good to publish the FSA. Either on > numpy.org, scipy.org or numfocus.org. Any objections/concerns about that? > > +1's from the people that signed would be good to have before moving > forward. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
